Information générale
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Versions des environnements
>>Yes, I know about TABLEUPDATE(). My point was that the deletes in the parent and child tables should occur "simultaneously." There should be no need to move the record pointer.
>
>As far as table health is concerned, there is no such need.
>
>It's just that Fox keeps sitting on the deleted record. You may issue a "locate rest" or some such command (even "skip 0" may work, haven't tried in a long time) if you want to make sure you're sitting on a valid record. Also, if you deleted the last record, you may be sitting on eof(), and you know several things which don't work in such a situation.
I agree it should be done. Maybe I misunderstood Naomi to mean moving the record pointer is necessary for the delete to work.
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement