>I have to say, in defense of all of us who fail to see what you so clearly see (and not because I in particular use or admire .Net, as I've articulated), that Grand Conspiracy Theories are a hard sell to all but a select group. Now if you were to present evidence and reasoning to support the GCT, that would likely gain you a receptive audience. A bunch of "could-be's" strung together does not, however, constitute evidence or reasoning. That you have a strong feeling about it does not constitute evidence or reasoning. In fact, your insistence that this particular GCT is so in the absence of evidence or reasoning may reasonably be taken as evidence for a lack of reasoning in reaching the conclusion.
>

You are entirely destroying the conversation by bringing logic, reasoning, and critical thought into it! :)