I am really getting hammered in the polls here. If the election in November had gone the same way it would have been Newt Gingrich sworn in yesterday ;-)

>Mike,
>
>I did not watch. I am also among the cynics - unless he can prove the money earned form Oprah joined the money
>he earned while giving false statements (under oath ?) and sewing others mentioning doping and his performance together.
>If he is broke because he reimbused the others - ok, perhaps remorse is true. Otherwise - no way.
>
>my 0.0001 €
>
>thomas
>
>>Did you watch the interview?
>>
>>>I will never read his book. I will never see his movie. The thing with dOprah whas just a marketing gimmick. Fake remorse, fake tears, fake fake fake. I hope he will get sued by all of those he sued.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sometimes I am wrong.
>>>>
>>>>I am watching Oprah Winfrey's much ballyhooed interview with Lance Armstrong. It was in leaks of the interview early this week that he finally admitted to using performance enhancing drugs after years of denial, after being stripped of all his titles. I strongly felt for years that he was guilty so it brought me satisfaction when he was brought to account.
>>>>
>>>>But guess what? Even though this does not reduce his guilt in the slightest, he seems genuinely remorseful. The interview starts with Oprah asking him a series of yes or no incriminating questions. He always answers yes. It pains you to watch it, picturing yourself confessing your worst sins. I have regained my respect for Lance Armstrong for admitting it. Good for him. May his life begin again.