Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Initial Proposals in Response to the Sandy Hook Shooting
Message
De
22/01/2013 19:57:14
 
 
Information générale
Forum:
News
Catégorie:
Social
Divers
Thread ID:
01563669
Message ID:
01563697
Vues:
39
>For purposes of this statute, “explosive device”
>means any explosive device of sufficient firepower to kill
>or maim a human being.


Such as ... a firecracker? http://online.wsj.com/article/APf231ddf494624e9c90bf3cd27057afc0.html

Or guns filled with blank rounds? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon-Erik_Hexum

Or a starter's pistol? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2275462

Or non-explosive? In 2007, 2008 and 2009, a total of 124 people, including 23 children and teenagers aged 18 and younger, were killed in Texas from accidents involving BB guns, pellet guns and other types of firearms that do not use gunpowder, according to data supplied by the Texas Department of State Health Services. http://travel.nytimes.com/2012/01/09/us/teenagers-death-a-reminder-of-gun-replicas-dangers.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

How about old fashioned shop tools? Hammers and hatchets to obtain pizza money? http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/wisconsin-boys-13-charged-brutal-hatchet-slaying-great-grandmother-change-buy-pizza-article-1.1165410

>The details would be wrtten into the code.

You can't legislate against stupidity, nor against a man devout in getting his crime committed -- especially if he's willing to sacrifice himself either legally or physically in the process.

More legislation is not the solution. Love, attention, education, and a proper foundation of faith is always the solution. And for those to which it's not the solution ... there is no solution for those people (and that includes additional legislation).
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform