>Whenever I use:
>FOR (items) IN (a Collection)
>I expect an ENDFOR, but
>FOR var = start TO end [STEP [-]n]
>I expect NEXT var, that is the way I roll :)


Me too. Also, the WITH x clause should NEVER, EVER include the trailing period. Each item between WITH and ENDWITH must have the trailing period. It makes it so much clearer at a glance what's going on there. Without that leading period, it's a question ... is this a property by itself, or is it part of the WITH? It's unnecessary. I've read estimate where 30+% of our brains are dedicated to processing visual stimuli. There's no reason not to use it. :-)