>>I am not singling you out, Gregory -- Craig has been much more offensive -- but can we please have a moratorium on beating Naomi up? Craig may have had a valid point that she is going about these tests the wrong way. That's all that needed to be said. There is no call for the insulting and condescending comments that have been added, especially knowing she is the sensitive type. That's just mean.
>
>I re-read that thread and Craig comments lately and I think I saw more sense in them a bit later when my immediate reaction had been. So I tried to use simpler tests and smaller methods and call them directly instead of through invoke method. The problem with this approach, though, that I had to make all my methods public in order to test them.
>
>I posted a question in MSDN forum about this problem (as I am almost afraid now to ask questions here).

The problem is that instead of thinking ( like the recursive thread) you are flooding the ut with messages and code. Something recursive is not that hard if one thinks, uses a bit of problem reduction, tests and gradually builds it

Cannot say I'm surprised if people think that they are asked to do your work