>>>>>>>The tests are worthless. Fix them or stop using them. They aren't telling you anything. You should call them "TSA Tests". You have a false sense that everything is ok.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I found a way (for now) to do what I need:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>  SalesUnitTest.isClassInitialized = false; // Need to re-initialize
>>>>>>>>         SalesUnitTest.ClassInit(null);

>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In the two tests I need to read fresh data.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I disagree, but you can not tell because you don't know what exactly I am doing
>>>>>
>>>>>and do you ?
>>>>
>>>>I am not singling you out, Gregory -- Craig has been much more offensive -- but can we please have a moratorium on beating Naomi up? Craig may have had a valid point that she is going about these tests the wrong way. That's all that needed to be said. There is no call for the insulting and condescending comments that have been added, especially knowing she is the sensitive type. That's just mean.
>>>
>>>I don't see how molly coddling her helps anyone.
>>
>>Communications is 20% what you say, 80% how you say it. Valid technical content in an unpleasant message is on average less effective than the same content in a neutral or positive message.
>
>I did not see Craig's response as unpleasant. Too bad if truth hurts.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder; you're not the only 3rd party viewing these posts.

Tom's post about public vs. private is also very well taken. IMO snide remarks in public show immaturity.

Sometimes people lose sight of the fact that participation of any kind on this forum is completely voluntary. There's no obligation to read, or respond to, any posts. There can be a real tendency towards "Duty Calls": http://xkcd.com/386/

To a large extent, the tone of posts becomes the tone of the whole community.