>>Not directly relevant but, IAC, it is much safer to use a static readonly rather than a constant. If you reference a constant defined in one assembly in another then it is cast in stone at compile time. If you subsequently change that value other assemblies would still be using the old value unless recompiled.
>
>I know this is an old thread, but I've been away from the UT for a couple of weeks.
>
>Another thing that I ran into with using constants is that our obfuscator wouldn't obfuscate them. I switched all my constants to static readonly.
>
>~~Bonnie

Interesting. I didn't know that. What obfuscator were you using ?