>>>>>I think it's a bad design in VFP that such an explicit call (AEVENTS()) is required when
>>>>>the same information (and more) is very likely almost always needed (along with
>>>>>some user-defined parameters being passed as per a custom basis).
>>>>
>>>>As someone who has used BindEvent() extensively, I disagree. I find that I rarely
>>>>need to know which object triggered the call. If you look back at my presentation,
>>>>I think you'll see that out of all my BindEvent() examples, only two or three call
>>>>AEVENTS().
>>>
>>>
>>>I think not knowing what a person doesn't have prevents them from realizing what's possible were it easily available.
>>
>>Jesus himself might not be able to parse that sentence ;-)
>
>Your words are very insensitive and showing no tact.

I thought my tact was intact ;-) I have stuck up for Rick here before. I admire the strength of his convictions. Where we bang heads is his belief that only he knows the one right way.