>>>>>I think it's a bad design in VFP that such an explicit call (AEVENTS()) is required when
>>>>>the same information (and more) is very likely almost always needed (along with
>>>>>some user-defined parameters being passed as per a custom basis).
>>>>
>>>>As someone who has used BindEvent() extensively, I disagree. I find that I rarely
>>>>need to know which object triggered the call. If you look back at my presentation,
>>>>I think you'll see that out of all my BindEvent() examples, only two or three call
>>>>AEVENTS().
>>>
>>>
>>>I think not knowing what a person doesn't have prevents them from realizing what's possible were it easily available.
>>
>>Jesus himself might not be able to parse that sentence ;-)
>
>Your words are very insensitive and showing no tact.

Why would tact be required? IMO, tact is to not talk about ropes in the home of a hanged person, or to sidestep one's disabilities and such. This issue of having to watch your language not to step over internal rules of each and every religion is, also IMO, encroachment into lives of non-members. Specially given the fact that the religious don't mince words when denigrating the non-believers. The golden rule did apply.

Actually, I'm happy with jesus. The jesus.dll, which saves my playlists in foobar.exe every ten minutes. I also like my new screen savior.