Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Gun Hysteria
Message
General information
Forum:
News
Category:
National
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01570858
Message ID:
01570890
Views:
35
>>>>>>The gun hysterics have lost what was left if their minds.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As if these weren't stupid enough:
>>>>>>http://abcnews.go.com/US/maryland-grader-suspended-pointing-finger-shape-gun/story?id=18123294
>>>>>>http://news.yahoo.com/seven-old-boy-lobs-pretend-grenade-during-recess-141128205.html
>>>>>>http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2013/01/03/dennys-kick-out-belleville-police-for-being-armed/
>>>>>>http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/region_central_southern_az/florence/florence-student-suspended-over-picture-of-gun
>>>>>>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/01/kindergartner-suspended-over-bubble-gun-threat/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Now this...
>>>>>>http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2012/08/28/family-school-made-deaf-child-change-sign-name-said-it-looked-like-gun/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It's nice to see the ACLU finally standing up for a civil liberty. If only it didn't take a deaf child to get them off their asses.
>>>>>
>>>>>That's the kind of stuff that will make the liberals proud though. They've made another big dent in gun crime.
>>>>
>>>>You understand of course that liberals have a huge problem with this right? ..and uhhh..the ACLU is the ones that are backing the kid right? So you saying the liberals would be proud makes zero sense at all ..hahahaha
>>>
>>>The PC liberals are the ones trying to reinstate the scary-looking weapons ban. You know - if it looks scary it must be banned.
>>>
>>>That sign looked like a scary gun, so ban the kid. right?
>>
>>There are idiots and nut jobs on both sides of the argument. Just because one liberal or one conservative says something, that doesn't mean that suddenly they all believe it. Rather than focus on these idiots and wackos I think it would be more constructive to actually..uhh..ya know...address the real issue at hand - which is of course that it's a) simply to easy for the wrong person to end up with a gun and b) there is no database to track the owner of a gun. Frankly I think that all guns sold should have the ballistics and owner's info stored in a database. Like how easy would that make the job for a cop? Someone gets shot - take the bullet, check the ballistics in the database - match with gun - match with owner - taadaa! You're 90% along the way of solving the crime. You combine that with background checks for EVERY GUN sold and I think there will be a massive amount of killings and shootings solved and prevented.
>
>The laws that are supposed to keep criminals from killing people have worked so well so far, why would we need more? They've worked equally well for drugs, alcohol, prostitution, rape, robbery, gang violence, etc.

How about because it would make it really REALLY easy to solve murder cases? ..and if the NRA wasn't involved in writing the damn laws then many of the murders wouldn't happen to begin with because the murderer wouldn't of got the gun in the first place.

Can we agree that if there was such a database(s) as I described that it would make it easier for law enforcement to find who the killer was and with properly working universal background checks for EVERY gun transaction it would prevent felons and mentally disturbed people from getting their hands on one? I do not see the problem here.

>Gosh - everything must be all beautiful and everyone is singing kumbaya already, right?

No - but at the same time we shouldn't put our heads in the sand and just live with the chaos and watch our kids being murdered just so the gun manufactures can make a buck.
ICQ 10556 (ya), 254117
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform