>>In this case yes - but what Hugo was pointing out is that people claim that these mass-shooter guys would just use a knife instead - so why worry about them getting a gun if they'll just get a knife instead? I think we can all agree that a wacko with a gun is far more dangerous that an wacko with knife. As matter of fact ANYONE with a gun is more dangerous that anyone with a knife. Hey - if that 4 year old couldn't of got a gun to shoot his aunt by mistake - he just would of grabbed a knife and stabbed her by mistake instead.
>
>I think most people would agree firearms are more dangerous than knives. Anyone arguing the opposite would be, well, bringing a knife to a gunfight :-{

now I am really gunning to have a word with you...
first you not only introduce logic but set theory into quasi-religous discussion,
and now you steal one half of the lines I was internally weighing...