You can reread UT rules and see that you broke rule #14. However, I would not reply here, if you cut off my answer to your initial reply. You didn't do it, moreover you even highlight it (one more UT rule). I don't claim copyright on my replies, but it seems to me obvious that you took inappropriate way.

>What do you mean "impolite"?? It was not intended to be anything but complimentary to UT and David. If you inform me as to the rule I have broken I will do all I can to avoid doing that in the future.
>
>By the way, your efforts were/are sincerely appreciated as well. I planned to respond to you when I came up with a solution that used FILTER. If I can not develop a solution that uses FILTER, I will use your excellent suggestion.
>
>>>Hello David,
>>>
>>>I appologize for sending this item to you directly, but I appear to be out of options. You have been more than helpfull with my questions in the past and I find myself stuck on an important issue to which I have recieved only one response. That response basically indicated that I can not do what I want to do. If you would take the time to review this issue and give me the benefit of your experience I would sincerely appreciate it.
>>>
>>>
>>>Here is the mission; should you choose to accept it...
>>>I have five tables open in a DATA ENVIRONMENT for a form, 3 that are linked to each other and 2 FREE TABLES. The two FREE TABLES should be irrelavent here. I want one of the 3 linked tables (SALES) to control two other linked tables (SALE_LINES and PURCHASE_PARTNERS) in that environment.
>>>
>>>sales.sale_id is a Primary index
>>>purchase_partners.sale_id is a Regular index.
>>>sale_lines.sale_id is a Regular index
>>>
>>>In the data environment I have set the FILTER for PURCHASE_PARTNERS to purchase_partners.sale_id=sales.sale_id purchase_partners information is displayed on the form using typical controls; nothing unusual. This information is filtered properly and appears as expected in the form.
>>>
>>>In the data environment I have set the FILTER for SALE_LINES to sale_lines.sale_id=sales.sale_id. sale_lines information is displayed in a grid. The expected entries in my sale_lines grid appear correctly only when the form is first loaded. When I SKIP+1 in the sales table then grid simply shows no entries. If I SKIP-1 in the sales back to the original sale then the correct sale_line information for that sale is displayed in my grid.
>>>
>>>The sale_lines table filter does not seem to be changing as the sales change.
>>>
>>>I have spent 3 hours trying all the usual stuff, including:
>>>- removing the tables from the data environment and readding them
>>>- forcing the filter to update after my: SELECT SALES, SKIP+1, by doing a SELECT SALE_LINES, SET FILTER TO SALES_LINES.SALE_ID = SALES.SALE_ID
>>>- checking the Help files
>>>- swearing
>>>Nothing has helped. I am now baffled. This can't be a limitation of VFP. A VFP table must be able to control two other tables in the same database using the filter command.
>>>
>>>Idea's???
>>>
>>>The most reliable way is to use parameterized view/cursor instead. Grids don't like filters (you can find some workaround to apply filter to grid, but it's really unstable).
>>>Edward Pikman
>>>Microsoft MVP/MCP - Visual Foxpro
>>>C/S Specialist, Information Technology, BMI
>>>212-830-8346, 718-951-4913
>>
>>Ian,
>>
>>I have to say that your post is really impolite and against UT rules.