>>And by the way a car has some actual uses for society and duh it's wasn't made with the sole purpose of killing so trying to link the two is also stupid.
>
>That's the way I look at it. As I pointed out to Jake last week you can look at risk-benefit ratio rather than fixating on just the risk. Assuming risk for low or no benefit is stupid.
>
>There are a few occupations such farmers and hunters where a case can be made that the benefit-to-risk ratio of owning firearms is reasonable. Not so for most of the US population.
With you totally on first paragraph. Probably benefit-to-risk is different from cultures long disarmed mostly. But I fully follow Jakes and others logic that it is a bad idea to heap even more laws and regulations upon non-criminal population just because it is easy to do - they should enforce existing legislation, make more spot checks on hidden carry and throw the book at criminals using weapons in crime.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement