>Dragan, even youmust see that your argumentation is a bit simple no? It does not take economic theory, nor does it take a screwed up spreadsheet to see why governments are requested to put some order in their finances after they have spent like there is no tomorrow money that they borrowed in favorable financial circumstances,

Favorable would need to be defined first. And specially to consider who borrowed and who's paying.

>Let's agree not to agree here or this is going to look like a religious discussion, and if there's one thing we don't want , is to be shown the religious section right?

Hey, you mentioned "belief" :). But if you have proof, we'll be thrown out of religion in a microsecond.