Calvin,
My prior responsibilities were for an app. with 35 gigs of FP data, at least 6 tables of which were always extremely close to 2 gig. Had top-flight performance all around for ONLINE work.
In other words, Fox *is* fast (with decent design) regardless of size of table(s). However, a a mid-tier, that will matter not at all.
Cheers,
Jim N
>I'm sorry that you had this happen to your table, but as soon as I saw your posting I couldn't help but wonder what kind of performance you were getting out of your app before the table crashed. I think we would all like to hear how fox works with such a large amount of data. Thanks.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only