>>>Make it simple; you are given a magical choice between removing guns from society or removing poverty (social, economic, educational) from society. Which one do you choose? I choose removing poverty because that would automatically make the existence of guns a non-issue. Choosing the first option will not solve the poverty issue and thus only modify or shift the crime problem; it will become knife crime or bomb crime or something else.
>>
>>Sadly such a magical choice doesn't exist. Obviously we need a lot of work on removing poverty...I couldn't agree more. None the less, while these issues are being addressed we can still have background checks and registration.
>
>You can have background checks and registration. The law-abiding will apply, pass and be registered. The criminals will get their guns without bothering to apply or be registered. We need to solve the right problems, which imo is poverty:

I don't want this to keep going in a circle - but again not creating a law because someone will break it is not a reason to not have the law...not to mention the fact that it would be nice to be able to trace a gun to it's last ligit owner.

>In November 2012 the U.S. Census Bureau said more than 16% of the population lived in poverty in the United States, including almost 20% of American children,[1] up from 14.3% (approximately 43.6 million) in 2009 and to its highest level since 1993. In 2008, 13.2% (39.8 million) Americans lived in poverty. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States

I agree the poverty problem needs to be addressed.