>As I said in the first post, the performance is still perfectly acceptable so I'm not going to spend a lot of time testing things. I just wanted to let you know in case other people were also seeing slower performance perhaps due to some misconfiguration.
>
>But others are reporting improved performance. Maybe it's something like this (examples only, not actual figures):
>
>Me: formerly under 0.25 seconds, now 0.25 - 0.50 seconds
>Others: formerly 1.0 - 1.5 seconds, now 0.25 - 0.50 seconds
>
>If someone else has seen improved performance, maybe they could give some idea of what their responses times used to be vs. what they are now.

I also checked on the hit response time for your requests at the server level. The range to process a request of yours is between an average of 0.05 to 0.20. So, that is about 1/20th of a second to 1/5 of a second. A specific list access, depending on which ones, might take about 1.1 second. But, this is not among the average hits. On this end, it cannot be faster than that. But, as I always want to go faster, the phase 3 will include a new box with lots of RAM, more CPUs and such. But, for now, this is more than acceptable.

I would still suggest to try from another browser, laptop, etc. I would also clear all the temporary files. As, if you get that visual impression, something might slow down directly at the PC level.