>>>>>That said, I must reiterate, my primary concern with this is not my own safety. I've engaged in the "safety" discussion because you are bringing it up. My primary concern lies in liberty and the deterioration of my constitutional rights.
>>>>
>>>>Ok your "primary concern" is not your own safety - or anyone else's for that matter. Screw everyone else, the hell with 32,000+ victims per year - I want my AK-47 and the hell with ya'll cause it's me me me my liberty...
>>>
>>>You have proven that you do not care about safety only guns. If you cared about safety you would not continue to throw up numbers which are easily outmatched by autos, poisoning and the other greater causes of death that I've previously mentioned.
>>
>>...and we're back to the circle again. round-and-round-we-go. Benefits vs risk Jake. Auto's have a more practical purpose for society and all of man-kind that a device designed with the sole intent of killing. How many times you gonna jump on this merry-go-round?
>
>We have gone around because you are attempting to define what's (now: "practical", formerly : "needed") in this discussion as if the argument holds any merit. It does not. Humans only "need" oxygen, food and water. Everything else is a "want".

No - we've gone around in circles because you're attempting to equate a gun with a car.