>>That's OK, but I thought about mm/dd/yyyy format.
>
>Sorry, I need to pay more attention....
No problem, I actually had this format also, so it was nice suggestion. For the mm/dd/yyyy or mm/dd/yy formats I went with the long manual way of constructing the output based on year, month, day, hour, minute functions.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
My Blog 
