>Earlier in the thread I said that I'd come down on the side of readability over some miniscule performance gain. I think you summed up the underlying possibilities quite nicely. :-)
Thank you, I'm a better philosopher than I am programmer (unfortunately)
>Small personal segue here. First, good to see you back. Second, I miss the previous signature.:-)
Again, thank you. What was the previous sig? "A bipolar theory does not neatly describe a continuum"? "Question Authority, but not your Mother"?
A bipolar theory does not neatly describe a continuum.
Before millenium: chop wood, draw water. After millenium: chop wood, draw water.