>>>Earlier in the thread I said that I'd come down on the side of readability over some miniscule performance gain. I think you summed up the underlying possibilities quite nicely. :-)
>>Thank you, I'm a better philosopher than I am programmer (unfortunately)
>
>Ah, don't give me that.:-)
>
>>>Small personal segue here. First, good to see you back. Second, I miss the previous signature.:-)
>>Again, thank you. What was the previous sig? "A bipolar theory does not neatly describe a continuum"? "Question Authority, but not your Mother"?
>
>The bipolar theory one, which is not to be confused with bipolar bear theory.:-)
well since you asked so nicely < BG>....
Jen
A bipolar theory does not neatly describe a continuum.
Before millenium: chop wood, draw water. After millenium: chop wood, draw water.