>Wow.. did you get up on the wrong side of the bed?
>
>Maybe Daniel never thought of an Identity column and it will actually be a better solution...or not. We don't know that.
>
>And I don't see you weighing in with a solution to his specific question.
>
>>In another recent thread, a person got angry because he disliked experts not answering the original question. Show him how to use what he is trying to use and don't tell him what not to do.

I usually applaud people providing every possible option, including and especially advice to use standards. However, in that other thread, one particular person (not Hugo) demanded that you and other experts answer the original poster's (OP) question as put. You had advised him not to do a non-standard thing. I agreed with you and the others that made that suggestion. The word arrogant was bandied about - for assuming what the OP may not know or what the OP's setup was like, just as Naomi has done here. By definition, it is people who try to tell experts how they should answer a question that is arrogant. If people who try to provide real advice are slammed for doing so, they might stop advising. Neither this person nor Naomi nor anyone else in that thread offered any solution to that original poster.

The person I refer to ended up attacking me and then trying to twit filter me with Naomi's help. She cannot even tolerate being twit filtered, so by what right does she help twit filter anyone?