It should be against the constitution to collect in any manner potential evidence that can be used against an individual. Taking fingerprints or collecting DNA evidence can lead to the arrest and conviction of guilty parties. That is so un American! Why all Americans should be able to do as he/she pleases.

Did you know that the Santa Clara University School of Law has a group of students that have helped freed convicted felons? They have insisted that when available DNA evidence be used to prove the prosecutions case. Many convicted felons have been freed due to the action of this group. One such case occurred in May of this year and freed a convicted rapist who was in prison for 14 years. It does not matter that the convicted man was innocent.

The convicted rapist being freed poses a problem. The authorities no longer have anyone in jail serving time for this crime. What can society do? Surely everyone arrested is guilty. Why have a trial? Just let the police shoot a prospective customer. If the police shoot someone they must be guilty. A bullet is only about 25 cents. Think of the cost savings!

Yes, this concept of evidence is unconstitutional. We just need to hang the guilty bastards and give them a fair trial! But then again why do we arrest Americans? Just because they commit crimes? Why that is our God given right and no one should interfere with what we do. Get rid of the police and let people do as they please. Just carry a gun and shoot any bastard that you do not like.





>Your DNA is now the equilivent of your fingerprint and can be taken without warrant or conviction.
>http://www.forbes.com/sites/gregorymcneal/2013/06/03/supreme-court-says-dna-like-fingerprints-may-be-taken-after-arrest/
>
>Here's the Opinion:
>http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-207_d18e.pdf
>
>The 4th means a little less today than yesterday.
>
>chip...chip...chip...