>>>Yeah. Maybe she has more mature ways to kill people now.
>>>She was obviously disenfranchised.
>>>Hopefully her victim has recovered - oh wait - she's dead (apparently shredded quite well).
>>
>>I view myself not as a chronic do-gooder - having read that her son approves of freeing her goes a long way of me agreeing with freeing her. While court system was in part created as to stop direct revenge, I think those directly affected by the crime (yes, I realize the most directly affected did not agree...) should be given the largest role in deciding if offender goes free early. So unless you have arguments showing the son being in cahoots or incredibly stooopid in other areas as well...
>
>If she does it to someone else the victims' son ought to get the same punishment as her.

I would have no qualms at all on making everybody in the loop of freeing her accountable for anything criminal done in a span of at least the amount of years she was freed early. But as in most cases civil "servants" decide, they have seen to it that they a get a royal amnesty for all their deeds. Pretty sure we are eye2eye on not holding our breath on such wishes ;-)