>>>>Many things that are today common practice would have been unimaginable just a few years ago. I'm telling you, in a few years down the road, you will have child offenders living their sexual preference and you are not allowed to judge them, because that would be discrimination.
>>>
>>>Agreed. Look at the Boy Scouts in the US. They are being pressed by the press and the 'enlightened ones' to allow that now.
>>
>>Nonsense. You're implying that every gay man is a child molester. In fact, the incidence of child molesters is the same for gay and straight adults.
>>
>>Tamar
>
>Actually, as I read it, Bill is not implying that every homosexual man is a child molester. Rather I interpret what he says to mean that by accepting one deviation and - sorry to say it folks, but to me homosexual behavior is a deviation- one might be opening the door for acceptance of the next.
>Given what I've seen since the 60's, I'd have to say that's he's got a point.

Statistical deviation or "abnormal"? It would seem homosexual behavior is quite normal for a a homosexual, where heterosexual behavior would be "abnormal".

I find it odd that anyone thinks the bulwark against or "cure for" homosexuality it some kind of legal, religious or social anathema. I don't think liberalized laws or attitudes about homosexual conduct would make it in any way more personally appealing to me, just as I don't condemnation and persecution by the righteous has had much effect on the historic fact that a certain percentage of the population is wired differently in this respect.

The slippery slope arguments seem on the same level as wanting to strangle red-headed infants as we cannot suffer a witch to live.