>>>>>Many things that are today common practice would have been unimaginable just a few years ago. I'm telling you, in a few years down the road, you will have child offenders living their sexual preference and you are not allowed to judge them, because that would be discrimination.
>>>>
>>>>Agreed. Look at the Boy Scouts in the US. They are being pressed by the press and the 'enlightened ones' to allow that now.
>>>
>>>Nonsense. You're implying that every gay man is a child molester. In fact, the incidence of child molesters is the same for gay and straight adults.
>>>
>>
>>I didn't imply anything oh queen of the enlightened ones. You seem to have come up with the idea.
>>
>
>Then, what did you mean by following "in a few years down the road, you will have child offenders living their sexual preference and you are not allowed to judge them" with " the Boy Scouts in the US ... are being pressed by the press and the 'enlightened ones' to allow that now"?
>
>Tamar

The press and enlightened ones like you have been pushing to get god (and morality - part of the foundations of scouting) out of scouts, and now are pushing to have homosexuals placed in with the boys. Being competitive liberals, that of course won't be enough will it?

The Boy Scouts as an organization is pretty much done for now because of this. Many troops have folded because they lost their charters (most are chartered through churches or other non-enlightened organizations). Opening the door by allowing openly homosexual scouts (kids 11-17 in an organization that disallows sexual activity during scouting activities) in guarantees that within a couple of years there will be many more suits as homosexuals try to get in a leaders of the boys (why?) - once that barrier breaks, the Boy Scouts will cease to exist.

Perhaps the man-boy love scouts will be the replacement?

Then perhaps they'll need to allow goats in so they won't feel disenfranchised.