>>The press and enlightened ones like you have been pushing to get god (and morality - part of the
>>foundations of scouting) out of scouts, and now are pushing to have homosexuals placed in with
>>the boys. Being competitive liberals, that of course won't be enough will it?
>>
>>The Boy Scouts as an organization is pretty much done for now because of this. Many troops have
>>folded because they lost their charters (most are chartered through churches or other non-enlightened
>>organizations). Opening the door by allowing openly homosexual scouts (kids 11-17 in an organization
>>that disallows sexual activity during scouting activities) in guarantees that within a couple of years there
>>will be many more suits as homosexuals try to get in a leaders of the boys (why?) - once that barrier
>>breaks, the Boy Scouts will cease to exist.
>
>That will be the argument used to allow gay leaders. "So, I was able to become an Eagle Scout as a gay boy, but now as an adult I cannot be a leader? How fair is that?"
>
>>Perhaps the man-boy love scouts will be the replacement?
>>Then perhaps they'll need to allow goats in so they won't feel disenfranchised.
>
>Ouch. Frightening. But you're right. The rallying cry would be that which we've already heard, "So long as I'm not hurting anyone else, where's the harm?"
>
>This is the first non-tech post you've ever written, William, that I more or less agree with from top to bottom. :-)
You haven't been paying attention, Rick. Bill has posted many non-tech messages. I happen to disagree with him across the board, but that's OK.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only