usually the amount of existing code in C/C++ is both larger and more refined (the latter mostly due to longer being in service, but still true)

>Why C++ and not C#? From my POV one is up to date and the other is seriously retro. It's like a lateral move from VFP.
>
>I am the first to admit you are smarter than me so maybe I'm just missing something.
>
>>God I love this business. For the first time I am doing what they said you could do in .NET but I've never done or seen done before - two languages in the same solution.
>>
>>And one of them is C++. Really a new experience. I am studying VC++ as fast as I can and trying to catch on to the whole Linking/compiling universe it inhabits and just where everything goes if using the VS2010 IDE (using VS2012 is not an option for this particular project as it just complicates the C++ side)
>>
>>Using Boost 1.54 and a whole lot of other stuff I'd never heard of as of July 4.
>>
>>I am going to be using QuickFAST (an opensource C++ project with a dotnet wrapper that decodes and deserializes feeds from financial markets that use the FAST/FIX protocol) and it isan adventure.
>>
>>Since I'm on the UT a lot I thought I check to see if we had any VC++ gurus in the house and if posting questions here was going to be useful. ( I also hang out on Stackoverflow, of course and QuickFAST has a very nice Google group)
>>
>>Now I think I should see if there is VC++ section of UT that I've just alwasy had turned off...
>>
>>(UPDATE - found the forum but it looks like no one is home)