>>>
>>>It's really simple - use the same method as they used to do the conversion. Then you won't have any problem here
>>
>>I don't understand you. However, I just got another idea from different source and I am going to try it first. I think this is what Rob suggested yesterday as well but I didn't understand him fully at first. Instead of having Dictionary String, String I may try Dictionary String, Object. May be this way my problem will be resolved automatically.
>
>Seems to me you're turning something simple into a big spaghetti

I explained the process in another message with the sample of the input. The input is not going to change and I don't know how exactly it was originally generated.

So, based on that input I need to do my processing. So, I am getting this string to work with and I need to compare values from that string with the column values.

Do you see a clever way to do this?