>>>>Wait for Jos's regular dose of relativization. You'll see that these only seem different, but are substantially the same. They seem different to you because that's how they look in your view of the world.
>>>
>>>What is "relativization" ?
>>
>>A process I have witnessed over and over. It's a bit hard to explain if you haven't met the word before, and I'm not sure I can come up with good examples (which is a skill which failed me many times here).
>>
>>I've seen it used to make black not so different from white (they are both non-colors among colors, anyway), that one cigarette butt is just about the same polution as what oil companies are doing in Nigeria, that tax evasion is just about the same level of crime as robbing whole countries... generally, that things which are very disparate in nature can be viewed as being of the same kind and thus pretty much the same, that all the difference is to be blamed on the beholder. Usually, some crucial difference is left out.
>
>I disagree that I suggest that view.

That's how I read it, or at least that's the impression left in my head after some of your posts. Possibly wasn't your intention.

We seem to have this in common, misread each other, eh?