>>>>>Yeah right. I'm sure things would of turned out better for everyone with your mentality behind it - we'd have three dead gunshot kids instead of one beat up kid.
>>>>
>>>>If you have the stones to severely beat another person, you should have the stones to face that person defending themselves.
>>>
>>>The driver wasn't even involved in the fight - so he jumps in the middle of it and ends up shooting a teenager because now he has to defend himself? I don't see how this benefits anyone and the end result is obviously worse.
>>
>>I mentioned somewhere else I don't have all the details, and I also said that a gun isn't the right tool for the job in this case. However, my statement about stones still stands.
>
>Right - but in this particular situation with him being 60+ years old, having no pepper spray or taser - you can't really knock the guy for handling it the way he did. Yes it would of been nice if he was a 30 year old blackbelt and was physically able to fend of 3 assailants, but that is simply not the case.
>Now if one of Sheriff Joe's armed posse bozo's would of been on the bus I suspect we'd have dead teenagers.

But, do nothing? Ignore it? (this is what he did, wasn't it?)

There's nothing he could have done?