>>>>>Yeah right. I'm sure things would of turned out better for everyone with your mentality behind it - we'd have three dead gunshot kids instead of one beat up kid.
>>>>
>>>>If you have the stones to severely beat another person, you should have the stones to face that person defending themselves.
>>>
>>>The driver wasn't even involved in the fight - so he jumps in the middle of it and ends up shooting a teenager because now he has to defend himself? I don't see how this benefits anyone and the end result is obviously worse.
>>
>>I mentioned somewhere else I don't have all the details, and I also said that a gun isn't the right tool for the job in this case. However, my statement about stones still stands.
>
>Right - but in this particular situation with him being 60+ years old, having no pepper spray or taser - you can't really knock the guy for handling it the way he did. Yes it would of been nice if he was a 30 year old blackbelt and was physically able to fend of 3 assailants, but that is simply not the case.
>Now if one of Sheriff Joe's armed posse bozo's would of been on the bus I suspect we'd have dead teenagers.
Ready for another wager Victor?
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only