>>>Ok well most people don't run towards confrontations and violent encounters, particularly when they're out numbered 3 to 1 by guys younger and stronger...and frankly doing so could be easily be (and should be) considered rather stupid and irresponsible.
>>
>>I realize that liberals are moving as fast as possible to the 'not my job' mode of thinking. They all can get government jobs that way.
>>
>>
>...
>>>>A taser might not be that bad an idea for drivers that have routes carrying little animals like those. A contact taser makes a pretty good point when needed, and you don't have to worry about missing.
>>>
>>>Yes I agree with that. Only concern of course would be if it's 3 against 1 there is a chance one of the thugs is just going to take it away from you though.
>>
>>Yes. Maybe everyone should just wait for the government to come to the rescue.
>>
>But is telling the kids to snitch on those offering drugs not also trying to build dependency on the gov ?

I'm not saying it is. Personally I think there are a lot of things kids need to work out for themselves in order to learn what they are made of.

One kid being beaten by 3 older, bigger kids is not something I'd let the kid sort out if I had a chance.

>I do realize that selling is illegal, but IMO slowly eliminating the market would be the better way - see my first post.