>>>Another one which looks at the internal workings of DNA. It is a software process which makes
>>>its own hardware (proteins) which continually read the software (DNA). Without either component
>>>working in amazing complexity, it fails.
>
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00vBqYDBW5s>
>>>It is of such a design and particularly complexity that it is impossible to have been created via
>>>undirected, natural processes. It was very obviously designed when you look at the complexity
>>>involved. It has information stores beyond imagination, all of which must work perfectly or life
>>>does not happen.
>>
>>It has been demonstrated that complex mechanisms could be created by evolution, giving it enough
>>time and specific circumstances. We are not there yet, but as years go by more and more we
>>understand how life was created.
>>Since there is zero proof of the existance of any intelligent creator, that is the only viable explanation.
>
>
>There is so much that's been learned about DNA since the year 2007 that it's fundamentally changing our understanding of the complexities of life. The video below shows that the possibility of a single protein being created by undirected natural processes is 1 * 10 to the 340,000,000th power (one times ten to the three hundred forty millionth power). Scientists generally agree that anything beyond 1 * 10 to the 70th power is impossible.
The conclusion of the video is bogus. Chance is not a one threaded process where combinations are tried in a serial manner; The number of concurrent trails are imaginable large, esspecially given the possibility that life was created outside earth but was carried by asteroids.
>It's unimaginable, Walter. There is no possible combination of time and undirected natural chemical processes that would account for single proteins coming into existence, let alone the thousands our bodies use, and in the particular way we use them.
Wrong, there is, but there is a lot to discover yet. The fact that we don't know does not mean there isn't. It funny that you on one had are trying to scientifically prove it cannot happen, while on the other hand find an explanation in something that has absolutely no scientifical indication at all.
>Open your eyes ... or you'll miss it. And that "it" is more than just this one video, or the message it conveys.
Open you're eyes, there is abslutely no prove of any creator, therefore the answers is most likely found in science. But then again, as history has proven time after time again, religion has rejected science over and over again while time has proven science to be right, time after time. Therefore (most) relegion has proven to be the real evil in this world, the cancer that has to be destroyed/marginalised through education and awareness. I'm confident that we will succeed doing that in the generations to come.
