>>>>>Another one which looks at the internal workings of DNA. It is a software process which makes
>>>>>its own hardware (proteins) which continually read the software (DNA). Without either component
>>>>>working in amazing complexity, it fails.
>>>
>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00vBqYDBW5s
>>>
>>>There is so much that's been learned about DNA since the year 2007 that it's fundamentally changing our understanding of the complexities of life. The video below shows that the possibility of a single protein being created by undirected natural processes is 1 * 10 to the 340,000,000th power (one times ten to the three hundred forty millionth power). Scientists generally agree that anything beyond 1 * 10 to the 70th power is impossible.
>>
>>The conclusion of the video is bogus. Chance is not a one threaded process where
>>combinations are tried in a serial manner; The number of concurrent trails are
>>imaginable large, esspecially given the possibility that life was created outside earth
>>but was carried by asteroids.
>
>The odds of one protein being created are about 1 * 10 to the 339.9998 million times less likely than reaching into a volume of space the size of the observable universe and pulling out the one, single red grain of sand on the first try from among the entire universe being filled with white grains of sand, not knowing in advance where it was placed, and just randomly reaching in to some spot and grabbing one.
>
>And there is information in DNA. Information cannot spontaneously arise from its absence.
>
>There are multiple layers of decryption at work, bit error detection and correction, to convert DNA to proteins. There's transcription from DNA to mRNA, translation from combinations of encodings through a reader into a writer which manufactures protein chains so fragile that if they didn't have helpers holding them in place and directing them to a folder, they would snap.
>
>The folder takes the long skinny balloon and twists it into a balloon animal, the final shape for it to do its work wherever it's needed, which is sent by an inner cell postal service.
>
>There are more chemical machines and processes going on in each cell simultaneously than in Earth's most populous cities.
>
>It is impossible to have arisen spontaneously. It is a self-evident proof.
>
>>>It's unimaginable, Walter. There is no possible combination of time and undirected natural chemical processes that would account for single proteins coming into existence, let alone the thousands our bodies use, and in the particular way we use them.
>>
>>>Open your eyes ... or you'll miss it. And that "it" is more than just this one video, or the message it conveys.


It is a self-evident proof.

Proof of what?
All you done is discredit (not disprove) a theory that contradicts yours.
That means nothing about the validity of your theory.

The Mayans thought it began one way, the Egyptians another, the Chinese another, the Romans another,
the Pagans another etc, etc.
Have you proven all of them to be wrong?

You've posed a false choice.
You have said: Prove your theory is correct or accept my theory.

With your superb intellect, Rick, I know that you know better than that.

00vBqYDBW5s