>>>>
>>>>They hesitate to attack Syria?
>>>>Tsk, tsk, tsk, What a bunch of impotent Chamberlains! Where is our Winnie the Warrior when we need him the most! {g}
>>>
>>>It sounds more like Vietnam and Iraq to me than it does like Munich.
>>>There was no justification for either of those wars and there's no justification for a US attack on Syria.
>>>I thought that I'd never agree with Rand Paul on anything, but on this issue he has the only clear eyes in Washington.
>>
>>No justification? We should just stand by idly when All Scruples Assad commits genocide on his own people? I think targeted bombs are justified, up to and including Assad himself.
>
>Any evidence of Assad using chemical weapons ? (Versus clear evidence so called 'rebels' had them in their premises)
>Perhaps they can dust off Collin Powell to make another convincing speech and there you go again...

>>Any evidence of Assad using chemical weapons ? (Versus clear evidence so called 'rebels' had them in their premises)
Perhaps they can dust off Collin Powell to make another convincing speech and there you go again...

The chemical weapons issue was irrelevant then and it's irrelevant now.
We had no business intervening as a country.
Both cases involved civil wars.
People do nasty things to each other while fighting civil wars, as our history shows us.
Before WWII, many civilians volunteered to fight against Fascists in the Spanish Civil war.
Anytime any civilians feel that strongly about Assad, let them go over and fight him.
I don't see any long lines forming.