>>>Mike, I truly believe the higher ups in your military are still more interested in saving US lives themselves than not having the losses reported on US TV.
>>>But the effect of those targeted bombs also killing non-combatants in high percentage without actual troop involvment will be worse in the long run for the US.
>>>It will strengthen the jihad mentality to go after US noncombatants as well if possible, fueling terrorist mind set.
>>
>>Terrorism is poor man's war. It loses the battle in the media, but on the ground, it gets things done.
>
>It is not that one-dimensional. It can result on heavy civil losses with accompanying direct damage in $ and future damage in hampering operations - having everybody strip searched might have been more costly than the towers themselves. But other targets like oil production and shipment have been relatively stable (and I refrain from pointing out a few easy vectors still available and not as easy/cost effective to protect) as are higher troop functions. But targeted bombs - compared to ground action - are much more prone to evoke the kamikaze mind set. Add cheap global transportation, basic chemistry knowledge and funds between a month and a half year of our gross...

I didn't say it gets the right, or even most effective things done. But at least it gives them the feeling they did what they could to get attention and some revenge.