Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Back to basics on foreign key constraint
Message
De
08/09/2013 08:49:48
 
 
Information générale
Forum:
Microsoft SQL Server
Catégorie:
Autre
Versions des environnements
SQL Server:
SQL Server 6.5 and older
Application:
Web
Divers
Thread ID:
01582500
Message ID:
01582506
Vues:
26
>Bill,
>
>Must be misunderstanding. I didn't say that CLASS_PK is the primary key in the PARTS table. It is the primary key in the PART_CLASS table (new table). (the PARTS table does have the primary key which is not relevant to this).
>

OK.

How did you go about setting the foreign key restraint?



>
>>I must be missing something Dimity.
>>
>>Why is class_pk in the parts table a primary key?
>>
>>I'd expect the part number or something like to be the PK in that table.
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I must be missing something simple. When I try to set the foreign key constraint, it fails. Here is the description:
>>>1. I added new table PART_CLASS with primary column CLASS_PK (Int), Identity.
>>>2. I added to PARTS table a column CLASS_PK (int), default 0
>>>
>>>I want to be sure that when/if the row/record in PART_CLASS is deleted, all referenced rows in PARTS set the value in columnd CLASS_PK to default (0).
>>>
>>>I think the constraint, when I set it up in SSMS, fails because table PARTS has many records and all of them have value 0 in the column CLASS_PK. But table PART_CLASS has no records. So SQL Server does not find a record in PART_CLASS of CLASS_PK value 0.
>>>
>>>How do you deal with this? TIA.
Anyone who does not go overboard- deserves to.
Malcolm Forbes, Sr.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform