>>>Trust me on this one.
>>>
>>>I recently bought a Blu-Ray player and have been watching a lot of discs, some new and some old. One of the older ones is "Memento," which came out a few years ago. At the time I had illusions of making a living as a screenwriter, like so many movie lovers. I hung out on a forum inhabited by actual screenwriters with produced credits. When "Memento" came out it was like a bomb going off. The pro's pros were falling all over themselves in their enthusiasm. There is a phrase in the trade called high concept. It means writing something strikingly original, something every other writer wishes they had come up with. In this case it is a story told backwards. Brilliant.
>>
>>Backwards and forwards at the same time, from the beginning and from the end, converging to a crucial point. Other than that, the movie had extremely low production values, which I don't give a single (or double) damn about, but about 90% of commenters on IMDB care for. Which means you don't really need all the Hollywood machinery to make a great movie - the most important resources are in the moviemakers' heads, not in the bankers' pockets.
>
>We don't often disagree. We sure do this time. IMO that was a terrific movie.

Huh? That's what I said. It doesn't matter that it was done on the cheap - actually, having big money spent on it would have probably ruined it. The low budget was the best thing that could happen to it.