>>LOL!!! So, doesn't that actually prove my point? It's like a little kid getting angry at Santa Claus for not bringing everything he asked for on Christmas...
>>
>>Basically, yes. Now, there are always going to be a certain # of people who will vacillate based on the immediacy of the moment, but what the general media really failed to report is the level of anger when lower and lower-middle income workers saw their paychecks go down after the first of the year. Certainly contradicts Barack Obama's pledge that "your tax dollars will not go up one cent". And then add to that, the executive order that Obama tried to push through in January to give Congress a pay increase.
>
>Speaking of being angry at Santa Obama - check out this one:
>
>http://www.mercurynews.com/nation-world/ci_24248486/obamacares-winners-and-losers-bay-area
>
>which contained this amazing quote:
>=====================
>"Of course, I want people to have health care," Vinson said. "I just didn't realize I would be the one who was going to pay for it personally."
>=====================
>Wake up. Anyone can have insurance, regardless of their current health, health/family history or ability to pay for any of it. But it won't cost a thing....change a thing...or reduce any services. And it will all be done with the same efficiency and effectiveness demonstrated by the other major government programs such as Amtrak, Medicare and Social Security.
>
>Yep - and if frogs had wings they wouldn't bounce on their a$$ so much...

Hey Phil, good to see you here.