This doesn't change anything though. All you're saying is that you disagree with the Supreme Court ruling - but fact of the matter is the decision has been made, so thus the
republican party is to blame. At the end of the day it's still the same thing - republican's have no valid point here.

>Victor, as a general concept, I understand what you're saying, but please read Message #1584831
>
>Laws that are protected by the Constitution must be, to use the football term for instant replay of "indisputable evidence", clearly within the parameters of the Constitution. I submit to you that the AHCA has not passed the test of the Constitutional process. It fails constitutionality for two reasons, either one conclusive.