>
The others are entitled to holler and decry, but demanding re litigation of a passed act as the price of government? Nope. >
>Are their constitutional arguments against the actions of the House? What laws have been broken by the House?
Exactly. No one is demanding re-litigation. It is a request for a delay (denied by Senate/Exec) which has now been turned into a requirement by not funding it.
Phil Thomas
http://phillipdthomas.comNever let your energy or enthusiasm be dampened by the discouragements that must inevitably come.....
