>His two opponents both had to drop out of the race due to marital infidelities. I think it may be bad luck to run against Barack Obama.
>
>Correct, and it was his campaign that helped bring those to light.
>
>But actually, what I was referring to was his first run for State Senate - his campaign had people (including the incumbent) thrown off the ballot for petition signature forgery - which was true, though it was later proven it occurred in his camp as well.
>
>Additionally, in the 2008 Dem. Primaries, 2 DNC people in Indiana committed massive petition signature forgery in 2 key congressional districts to get him on the ballot in the Primary. Without the forged sigs, he did not have enough to get on the ballot. Those men were sentenced to prison back in the spring of this year - a fact that most media outlets ignored.
>
>This is largely why people equate Obama with "Chicago Politics", a characterization that MSNBC states is racist. (They'll refer to news reports that talk about his campaign as racist, but they won't talk about the actual activities that lead to the characterization)
>
>Bottom line: yes, no politician is pristine when it comes to these things. I understand that. (For instance, Ronald Reagan is loved by many, but the truth is that he might have cost Gerald Ford the White House in 1976 by refusing to help him in key states that Carter wound up carrying.) But from my perspective, Barack Obama's campaigns are the dirtiest, most corrupt, most crooked of all.

>>But from my perspective, Barack Obama's campaigns are the dirtiest, most corrupt, most crooked of all.
Hmm for pure, unabashed corruption and crookedness I'd put the court's decision on Bush V Gore at the top of my list.
Do you have any idea what Nixon's people did during the 1972 campaign?
How about Tom Delay's gerrymandering?
Even the most rabid dem's admit that Daley stole Illinois for JFK in 1960 and that Joe Kennedy probably had ballot boxes stuffed in West Va.

Barack Obama is an amateur compared to any of those.