Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Shake's Week 7 NFL Picks
Message
 
 
Information générale
Forum:
Sports
Catégorie:
Football
Divers
Thread ID:
01585635
Message ID:
01585647
Vues:
20
>Seahawks - Looking at the schedule they should be 10-1 before facing the Saints after a bye.
>Patriots - Jets handed the Steelers their first turnover and win of the season. Even with who-dey WRs, Brady will mince them
>Eagles - I don't know why it's just a feeling I have that we're do for "bad-Romo"
>Falcons - Who cares?
>Lions - Battle of North division leaders. Picking the home team
>Panthers - No real opinion, picking the home team again
>Bears - Can you say sophmore slump? RG3 can.
>Dolphins - I think they're better than I think
>Chargers - Jags seemed "up" for the Manning test, I expect a return to reality
>49ers - After a bit of a stumble they have righted the train
>Packers - Rodgers disappointed me coming out of the bye. They've won but not through the air. I expect that to change.
>Steelers - God help me
>Chiefs - This is my Duh of the week. I think the oddsmakers have this one wrong, KC should be a bigger favorite at home.
>Broncos - Game of the week. Picking the undefeated team but it would not surprise me for the Colts to spoil Manning's homecoming
>Giants - Again, god help me. Eli is bound to continue to disappoint but even with AP the Vikes are just bad
>
>Based upon Kevin's previous post and my excuse laden total I see us at:
>Swami - 8+12+8+11+8+11 = 58
>Shake - 8+12+10+10+7+10 = 57
>Homer - 9+12+11+9+8+8 = 57

RG3 has been playing hurt and it's not like he is surrounded by good players.
The Packers are not a good team. They are on TV here a lot and you can see that they have declined. You're right, they have lost almost all of their receivers.

Unrelated to your predictions, I am seriously tired of Roger Goodell. I get steady emails from him saying how much importance the NFL puts on player safety, specifically concussions. A little late to the party, aren't you Roger?
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform