>>>I don't hate the idea of Visual Freepro. One reason I choose not to use your product is that you
>>>seem to have an irrational belief in some kind of Microsoft conspiracy. All along I've been telling
>>>you what best practices are - "Not Microsoft's agenda". You seem to have stated that you believe
>>>that not using PUBLIC is a dictate from Microsoft. You've even implied that some Fox people are
>>>part of this conspiracy.
>>>
>>>FoxPro does have some really stupid stuff in it - that made sense at the time I'm sure - for one - storing
>>>the path to a form - or to classes within the form. The pathing is important at design time. It is unimportant
>>>or even incorrect at runtime - therefore the design environment has been forced into the runtime
>>>environment - which is harmful and confusing. Storing multiple unrelated classes in a single classlib
>>>and having no way to simply include a class in the exe unless it is in a classlib - unlike the .PRG
>>
>>
>>I will not be responding to any of your future posts unless you ask me a direct question.
>
>Glad to know that. Who needs another programming language.

Nah, he's just trying to create a new standard, and we all know that standards are a good thing -- everyone ought to have one. <g>

Odd random thought... . If I stand to the right and think in Latin, does that make everyone else sinister?