>>>>I agree with your separation idea. It's one facet of the "*n?x Way". I seem to recall George Tasker being a big proponent of this (haven't seen him here in a long time, his last logon was August 2011).
>>>
>>>Sad news -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Tasker
>>
>>I don't think that's our George Tasker, based on the description of the career.
>
>Besides, it clearly says it's "United Kingdom law-related biographical article", obviously unrelated.

Only obvious if you read the whole article instead of skipping to the end ;-( I goofed.