>>>I can skip 10 times, but then it's a habit, it's tiresome. And I don't post non-technical stuff in technical threads.
>>>
>>>PMFJI (and I am probably going to be sorry that I did {sigh})
>>>
>>>If you don't post non-technical stuff in technical threads, exactly what do you call this very long exchange between you and John?
>>>
>>>IMHO, and you can correct me if I am wrong, you are not the forum police. If Michel wants to make a rule that only technical content may be expressed in technical threads, that is certainly his prerogative. But it really is not up to you to decide what behavior is appropriate on the UT.
>>>
>>>Also, I always thought that the point of posting answers in any technical forum was to help the person who posed the question as well as any lurkers who might have the same question. I never for a moment believed that it was to gain recognition for oneself. At least, that was the reason that I answered questions in the days when I was more active on-line.
>>>
>>>Just my 2 cents. You may respond if you like, but this is the last thing I have to say on this subject. After all, I do not want to pollute a technical thread with any more non-technical posts
>>
>>I agree, but I didn't start the whole thing. I just gave my opinion and thought it will be end of it. I also post to help the person who asks the question.
>
>
>But you did start the whole thing. Your nasty reply to Mike started the whole thread. Can you not accept responsibiility for anything you do?



Speaking of 'start'

It was her reply to Mike that started you, No one else

It didn't really start until you decided to bring in the bazookas