>>>First, different European intelligence communities also reported that Hussein had WMDs.
>
>They must have been very "different" since the ones that mattered, said the opposite. Which is why they didn't join the attack.

There's a flaw there.. There were nations that stated at the time of the war that they thought Iraq had WMDs, but didn't join the attack.

There were also nations who initially committed troops (in some cases, small countries, small # of troops), but then pulled out.

Look, I won't defend the intelligence on WMDs. Either there were none, or very little. But there were other justifications. And by the way, you posted in early 2007 that you acknowledged Hussein got what he deserved. :)