>It's a thoroughly unreasonable partisan attitude.
>A) Just because it's "partisan" doesn't make it invalid.
I said "thoroughly unreasonable" partisan attitude. Partisan is an adjective, not a proof.
>>B) Over the course of time, the more moderate Democrats have come to acknowledge this as well
That the President lied? Wow.
>>C) Sounds like more of a way for you to dismiss it
My grounds led to the interpretation, it doesn't stand alone or act as a proof just by being said.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
